B&N Audiobooks Subscription = SAVINGS. Sign Up Today for a Free Book!
The Palace Papers: Inside the House of Windsor--the Truth and the Turmoil

The Palace Papers: Inside the House of Windsor--the Truth and the Turmoil

by Tina Brown

Unabridged — 17 hours, 56 minutes

Tina Brown

Audiobook (Digital)

(Not eligible for purchase using B&N Audiobooks Subscription credits)
$24.99
(Not eligible for purchase using B&N Audiobooks Subscription credits)
$27.50 Save 9% Current price is $24.99, Original price is $27.5. You Save 9%.
View All Available Formats & Editions

Listen on the free Barnes & Noble NOOK app


Overview

NEW YORK TIMES BESTSELLER ¿ The “addictively readable” (The Washington Post) inside story of the British royal family's battle to overcome the dramas of the Diana years-only to confront new, twenty-first-century crises
 
“The beach read of the summer . . . juicy, satisfying entertainment.”-Town & Country

“Never again” became Queen Elizabeth II's mantra shortly after Princess Diana's tragic death. More specif­ically, there could never be “another Diana”-a mem­ber of the family whose global popularity upstaged, outshone, and posed an existential threat to the Brit­ish monarchy.

Picking up where Tina Brown's masterful The Diana Chronicles left off, The Palace Papers reveals how the royal family reinvented itself after the trau­matic years when Diana's blazing celebrity ripped through the House of Windsor like a comet.

Brown takes readers on a tour de force journey through the scandals, love affairs, power plays, and betrayals that have buffeted the monarchy over the last twenty-five years. We see the Queen's stoic re­solve after the passing of Princess Margaret, the Queen Mother, and Prince Philip, her partner for seven decades, and how she triumphs in her Jubilee years even as family troubles rage around her. Brown explores Prince Charles's determination to make Camilla Parker Bowles his wife, the tension between William and Harry on “different paths,” the ascend­ance of Kate Middleton, the downfall of Prince An­drew, and Harry and Meghan's stunning decision to step back as senior royals. Despite the fragile monar­chy's best efforts, “never again” seems fast approaching.

Tina Brown has been observing and chronicling the British monarchy for three decades, and her sweeping account is full of powerful revelations, newly reported details, and searing insight gleaned from remarkable access to royal insiders. Stylish, witty, and erudite, The Palace Papers will irrevoca­bly change how the world perceives and under­stands the royal family.


Related collections and offers

Editorial Reviews

From the Publisher

Zingers crisscross these pages like tracer fire. . . . [Tina Brown] becomes the ideal tour guide: witty, opinionated and adept at moving us smoothly from bedchamber to belowstairs while offering side trips to the cesspits of the tabloid press, the striving world of second-tier celebrities and the threadbare lodgings of palace supernumeraries.”The Wall Street Journal

“Frothy and forthright, a kind of ‘Keeping Up With the Windsors’ with sprinkles of Keats.”The New York Times

“[Tina Brown] deploys her sterling contacts and deeply embedded sources, her familiarity with British royal history and her personal encounters with royals, palace courtiers, politicians and journalists to serve up a luscious feast of . . . well, yes, gossip. But what elegant gossip, dressed up in Brown’s stylish sentences and erudite insights.”—USA Today

“Addictively readable . . . the most essential book of the Markle interregnum.”The Washington Post

“Gripping . . . [The] real power of this book is the cumulative picture it builds of lives as they have to be lived by the rules and customs of the Windsor palaces.”The Daily Beast

“Brown is a deft and wily royal chronicler, marshaling a heavy arsenal of details into a wickedly edible narrative. Her cynical eye and free, indirect style sustain and synthesize a range of viewpoints, and she’s retained the editor’s knack for devastating capsule descriptions. . . . An excellent primer for the unpredictable years ahead.”Los Angeles Times

“Clever, well-informed and disgustingly entertaining.”The Times (UK)

“A motherlode of delectable royal gossip . . . Brown has produced a work both scholarly and scandalous that makes us think about what the post-Elizabethan world may bring, alternately amusing and horrifying us along the way. . . . Vivid and richly embroidered.”The Independent (UK)

“A compulsive read . . . Brown’s turn of phrase—honed by decades at the helm of Tatler, Vanity Fair and The New Yorker—is the stuff of The Queen and The Crown creator Peter Morgan’s scriptwriting dreams.”The Telegraph (UK)

“The devil is in the delicious detail. . . . Brown tackles her subjects with the same brio she brought to her years as a highly regarded magazine editor. . . . Her access to those who flit around the royals gives her writing an edgy authenticity.”Daily Mail

“Brown thrashes her way through absolutely everything that has happened to the family since the end of the last book in 1997. . . . Charles and Camilla are vividly brought to life in a series of well-researched stories and anecdotes.”The Sunday Times (UK)

“It’s hard to look away as Tina Brown delves into decades’ worth of royal scandals.”The Guardian (UK)

Library Journal

04/30/2022

Brown (the former Tatler and Vanity Fair editor in chief, and author of The Diana Chronicles and The Vanity Fair Diaries) uses research and interviews to chronicle the events of the British monarchy since Princess Diana's 1997 death. The book backtracks somewhat to discuss Queen Elizabeth's courtship and marriage to Prince Philip and the rocky marriages of their children, but Brown focuses more on contemporary events like the weddings of Charles and Camilla, William and Kate, and Harry and Meghan. Brown investigates the scandals of Sarah, Duchess of York; the deaths of the Queen Mother, Princess Margaret, and Prince Philip; and Harry and Meghan's move to the United States. She also looks into accusations against the disgraced Prince Andrew and his association with Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. Brown vividly describes the events and the personalities of the royal family, captures the essence of royal life, and shares numerous amusing anecdotes, but is also somewhat bristly and reveals her biases. For instance, she blames the Spencer family (not infidelity) for the breakdown of Charles and Diana's marriage. It's also clear that Brown is not a fan of Harry or Meghan: her book often refers to Harry as "emotionally fragile" and uses Meghan's estranged father as a primary (and negative) source. VERDICT An intriguing account of the royals that should provoke much discussion (and many arguments). Fans of the British royals and royal history will be seeking out Brown's book, particularly as 2022 is Queen Elizabeth's Platinum Jubilee year.—Lucy Heckman

Kirkus Reviews

★ 2022-04-26
Veteran journalist Brown examines the alternating currents of “deep dullness” and pitched controversy surrounding the House of Windsor.

“We don’t want another Diana.” Thus runs a mantra among Britain’s royal family, whose more retiring members—most notably Queen Elizabeth II—harbor a deep fear of scandal. Yet, as Brown’s account opens, scandal and controversy emerge as the coin of the realm, in this case with the brouhaha surrounding Prince Harry’s marriage to Meghan Markle, marked by “the Palace’s inaction at her character assassination by the press.” As the author remarks, the royal family, headed by a 96-year-old with a 74-year-old waiting to assume the throne, “cannot be expected to be nimble.” Indeed, many of its members are downright boring, if dutiful, in contrast with rebels such as Diana and Meghan, to say nothing of disgraced figures such as Andrew and Fergie. In the case of Diana’s gruesome death, writes Brown, “the Queen’s usual impeccable sense of how to do the right thing…was beset by the need for a new kind of emotional response that met the moment of the crisis,” which Elizabeth couldn’t muster. Indeed, she emerges as remote, even cold, some of which, Brown allows, can be traced to the requirements of rule, some to a marked distaste for confrontation. So it was that she ordered Charles to delay his wedding to Camilla Bowles by a day in deference to the funeral of Pope John Paul II, at which “the otherwise stalwart Camilla went into meltdown.” Brown, superbly equipped to dig deep into the Windsors, turns in scathing, nicely gossipy portraits of some of them, especially Andrew, a corrupt, venal “horndog eternally on the hunt,” mixing them with quietly admiring portrayals of figures such as Kate Middleton, who exemplifies “duty and loyalty to the Crown” and an avenue to a brighter future.

Fascinating and fast-paced, Brown’s blockbuster is a must for royal watchers.

Product Details

BN ID: 2940176417173
Publisher: Penguin Random House
Publication date: 04/26/2022
Edition description: Unabridged

Read an Excerpt

Prologue

Kryptonite


The Oprah Winfrey interview with Prince Harry and Meghan, Duke and Duchess of Sussex, in March 2021 was one of the most ballyhooed in television history. It was recorded one year after their bolt for the royal exit in the palmy gardens of an undisclosed mansion in Montecito, their California Elba perched high above the Pacific coast. Oprah’s outsized glasses magnified her wonder at the couple’s nuclear revelations about the House of Windsor.

“Were you silent or were you silenced?” the TV oracle demanded in her most commanding tone over the ominous soundtrack in the teaser to the two-­hour special. The camera panned to Meghan’s narrowed eyes, then cut off before we could learn her response. Forty-­nine million people globally tuned in to find out. The Duchess wore smoky, tragedy eye makeup, first deployed by Diana, Princess of Wales, in her notorious interview with Martin Bashir, and her hair was in a low bun for confessional gravitas. There was much parsing amongst Meghan fans of the white lotus detail (resurrection!) on the long black Giorgio Armani dress belted high over her baby bump.

Royal code breakers noted that on Meghan’s left wrist was her late mother-­in-­law’s Cartier diamond tennis bracelet, signifying that the mantle of wronged royal woman was now hers. Harry, for his part, was lambasted on Twitter for the sartorial fail of his disconsolately saggy socks and undistinguished J.Crew suit. The main theme of his complaint was that his dad, the Prince of Wales, had misread his statement about seeking financial independence and cut off his money.

A damning charge sheet was presented by the House of Sussex: institutional disregard of Meghan’s mental health; the Palace’s inaction at her character assassination by the press; family jealousy; and, most serious of all, the explosive charge of racism against an unnamed Royal Family member who had raised “concerns” about how dark-­skinned the unborn Archie could be.

It was kryptonite.

Prince William’s terse response several days later to press trailing him on an engagement was: “We are very much not a racist family.” But how would he know? Meghan Markle is the first person of color to marry a Mountbatten-­Windsor, and the diversity percentage amongst Buckingham Palace employees is 8.5 percent.

The social media maelstrom immediately showed a heated transatlantic divide in the audience reaction. Americans who have never forgiven the Windsors for their rejection of Diana mostly cheered the Sussexes for blowing the whistle on the monarchy’s whole crumbling theme-­park enterprise. Against the backdrop of the Black Lives Matter movement, the racism allegation only confirmed that royal dinosaurs should no longer rule the earth. Even President Biden’s press secretary Jen Psaki weighed in, praising Meghan’s courage for airing her anxiety and depression.

The British reaction predominantly went the other way—outrage at the display of such arrant disrespect for the monarchy and an angry focus on the many disputable, unchallenged claims by the couple. There was widespread skepticism at Meghan’s assertion that she had nowhere to turn with her thoughts of suicide except the Buckingham Palace HR department—a surreal-­sounding place that few people had ever heard of (and that sounded ripe for a BBC sitcom written by Ricky Gervais). Wasn’t Harry, who had himself spent years in therapy, also one of the founders of Heads Together, a royal initiative with Prince William and Kate to end the stigma around mental illness? Whatever adjustment problems Meghan experienced, they were clearly too painful for Harry to watch. On both sides of the pond, the younger generation was ardently on Team Meghan for saving her sweet, sexy husband from his crusty, clueless relations.

Less discussed were Meghan’s puzzling—and to me, fascinating—comments about her lack of preparation for royal life. “I didn’t fully understand what the job was,” she told Oprah. “What does it mean to be a working royal? What do you do? . . . As Americans especially, what you do know about the royals is what you read in fairy tales. . . . I grew up in L.A., you see celebrities all the time. This is not the same but it’s very easy, especially as an American, to go, ‘These are famous people.’ [But] this is a completely different ball game.”

Uh, yes. The notion that the countryside-­rooted, duty-­obsessed, tradition-­bound senior members of the British Royal Family bear any resemblance at all to Hollywood celebrities is head-­explodingly offtrack. Celebrities flare and burn out. The monarchy plays the long game. There is no time stamp on the public’s interest in you as long as it’s clear that your interest is the public’s. As the Queen’s grandmother Queen Mary once said to a relative, “You are a member of the British royal family. We are never tired and we all love hospitals.”

The dazzle of royalty that captivated Meghan is an optical illusion. It was hard for her to grasp that the organic lemon and elderflower dessert served at her fairy-­tale Windsor Castle wedding was Alice in Wonderland’s “Eat Me” cake. Even as she became a bigger and bigger star on the global stage, she would have to simultaneously shrink into the voiceless requirements of service to the Crown. Meghan’s curious failure to prepare for a vocation that was the royal equivalent of taking the veil was a surprise to many of her former colleagues on the USA Network show Suits, where she appeared as a supporting player for seven years. According to a colleague on the show, Meghan as an actress had always been known for “doing her homework,” exhaustively grilling anyone who could help her for “notes.”

It’s baffling she did not do the same for the most important role of her life. The main reason that Diana’s Mr. Wonderful, the heart surgeon Hasnat Khan, whom she dated after her separation from Charles, didn’t want to marry her is that he knew he couldn’t live with being traduced every day on the front pages of the tabloids.

A former member of the royal household told me,


I suppose my sense from the beginning was that you had in Meghan someone who had no context through which to comprehend the institution. And in the Palace, you had an institution that had no context for understanding Meghan. So, you had this huge problem of two worlds colliding, that had no previous experience of each other.


The British monarchy is a more than one-­thousand-­year-­old institution with a ninety-­six-­year-­old CEO and a septuagenarian waiting in the wings. It cannot be expected to be nimble. It builds its social capital with steady, incremental acts of unexciting duty. Every so often the glacier moves, usually after a resounding shock to the system: the abdication of Edward VIII to marry the divorced American Wallis Simpson, when it tightened to repel any more intruders; the death of Diana and the ensuing public hysteria, when it reassessed and quietly became more accessible; and the crisis of “Megxit,” when the Duke and Duchess of Sussex made a choice between the Commonwealth and Netflix and followed the money. It will be several years before we know how seriously the monarchy has reckoned with its failures to reflect the diversity of the country it symbolizes—and works for.

But change it will. The backstory of what propelled the British monarchy from the era when Princess Margaret could not marry the man she loved in 1955 because he was divorced, to twenty-­six years later, when Prince Charles was made to marry a twenty-­year-­old virgin with a suitable pedigree, to the momentous milestone of 2018, when a divorced, biracial American received the Queen’s blessing to marry her grandson: All are potent reminders that the monarchy’s prime goal is to survive.

“I didn’t do any research,” Meghan admitted to Oprah in the interview.

I did. Over two years, in person, and over Zoom as the COVID-19 pandemic descended, I talked to more than 120 people, many of whom have been intimately involved with the senior royals and their households during the turbulent years since Diana died.

My focus for this book is the ensuing twenty-­five years up until today. But as we shall discover, the fascination of monarchy is that its themes—and its problems—repeat themselves over time through its reliably fallible and all-­too-­mortal protagonists. To understand the House of Windsor as it is today, one must understand the forces, human and historical, that shaped it. I have structured The Palace Papers into chapters centered on the key individuals who have molded the monarchy’s recent history: Diana, Camilla, Charles, Philip, Margaret, Andrew, and, more recently, William, Harry, Kate, Meghan, and their families. We shall travel back in time, from World War II to the lurid nineties, from modernizing millennial Britain to the “Peak London” of the Olympics, from the angry divisions of Brexit to the shared pain of a world pandemic. We shall meet prime ministers, influential courtiers, powerful spin doctors, lowly hangers-­on, lovers, rivals, and even outright enemies. We’ll parse the layers of aristocracy as well as the complex relationship between the royals, the media, and the public.

Above all, I hope we will get closer to understanding the woman who matters more than anyone else: the Queen.

Customer Reviews