Suing Alma Mater: Higher Education and the Courts

Suing Alma Mater: Higher Education and the Courts

by Michael A. Olivas

NOOK Book(eBook)

$26.99 $35.95 Save 25% Current price is $26.99, Original price is $35.95. You Save 25%.
View All Available Formats & Editions

Available on Compatible NOOK Devices and the free NOOK Apps.
WANT A NOOK?  Explore Now

Overview

Although much has been written about U.S. Supreme Court decisions involving higher education, little has been said about the foundational case law and litigation patterns emerging from the lower courts. As universities become increasingly legislated, regulated, and litigious, campuses have become testing grounds for a host of constitutional challenges. From faculty and student free speech to race- or religion-based admissions policies, Suing Alma Mater describes the key issues at play in higher education law.

Eminent legal scholar Michael A. Olivas considers higher education litigation in the latter half of the twentieth century and the rise of "purposive organizations," like the American Civil Liberties Union and the Alliance Defense Fund (now known as the Alliance Defending Freedom), that exist to advance litigation. He reviews more than 120 college cases brought before the Supreme Court in the past fifty years and then discusses six key cases in depth. Suing Alma Mater provides a clear-eyed perspective on the legal issues facing higher education today.

Product Details

ISBN-13: 9781421409245
Publisher: Johns Hopkins University Press
Publication date: 07/01/2013
Sold by: Barnes & Noble
Format: NOOK Book
Pages: 240
File size: 3 MB
Age Range: 18 Years

About the Author

Michael A. Olivas is the William B. Bates Distinguished Chair of Law at the University of Houston Law Center and director of the Institute for Higher Education Law and Governance.

Table of Contents

Preface
Part I
1. A Primer on Higher Education Law in the United States
2. A Brief History of Higher Education Litigation in the United States Supreme Court
3. Making It to the Supreme Court and the Rise of Purposive Organizations
Part II
4. The Traditional Model of Higher Education in the Litigation Spotlight: United States v. Fordice
5. Hopwood v. Texas: "A University May Properly Favor One Applicant Over Another Because of His Ability to Play the Cello, Make a Downfield Tackle, or Understand Chaos Theory"
6. Abrams v. Baylor College of Medicine: Jews Need Not Apply
7. Axson-Flynn v. Johnson: "Talk to Some Other Mormon Girls Who Are GoodMormons, Who Don't Have a Problem with This"
8. Location, Location, Location: Richards v. League of United Latin AmericanCitizens and the Cartography of Colleges
9. Clark v. Claremont University Center: "I Mean, Us White People HaveRights, Too"
9. The Developing Law of Faculty Discontent: The Garcetti Effect
Conclusion: My Friends, Special Programs, and Pipelines
Appendix A: Annual Reviews of Higher Education Law
Appendix B: United States v. Fordice, 505 U.S. 717 (1992) Case History
Notes
Bibliography
Index

What People are Saying About This

"This is an extremely significant book. It is clearly written and reflects Olivas’s extensive experience and broad expertise, especially his uncommonly perceptive view of an increasingly litigious campus environment."

Robert O'Neil

"This is an extremely significant book. It is clearly written and reflects Olivas’s extensive experience and broad expertise, especially his uncommonly perceptive view of an increasingly litigious campus environment."

Customer Reviews