27.99 In Stock
BUCKLE UP—2020 WILL BE THE POLITICAL RIDE OF YOUR LIFE! IN NOVEMBER TRUMP WILL SMASH THE LEFT AND WIN!"'BLITZ, Trump Will Smash the Left and Win', by David Horowitz. Amazon #1 Bestseller. Hot book, great author!" — President Donald J. Trump“We love David Horowitz. He thinks Trump is gonna win in a landslide in November, and he gives reasons why in the book, and he says Republicans are gonna be singing 'Happy Days Are Here Again' once November comes and the election is over and the votes are counted.” — Rush Limbaugh“If you’re interested in debating deranged liberals with facts, you won’t want to miss this latest book.” — Donald Trump, Jr.“BLITZ is a MUST-read for those who want to better understand what is really happening in the ‘idea war’ for the soul of America.” — Governor Mike HuckabeeBLITZ reveals the attacks made against Trump have been the most brutal ever mounted against a sitting president of the United States. Blinded by deep-seated hatred of his person and his policies, the left even desperately tried to oust Trump in a failed impeachment bid. Horowitz shows that their very attacks—targeting a man whose mission has been to “Drain the Swamp” and “Make America Great Again” backfired, turning Trump himself into a near martyrwhile igniting the fervor of his “base.”With the 2020 election upon us, New York Times bestselling author David Horowitz chronicles the brutal battles, bitter backlash, and leftwing lies Trump has faced as Democrats repeatedly try to sabotage his presidency. You’ll discover the left’s terrifying socialist and, in some cases, communist agendas as you’ve never seen them before. Trump’s response? In the meantime, he’s going to steamroll this opposition in November using the same playbook he has used to win before. In BLITZ you will find shocking revelations:
- The 9 biggest dangers to America the left poses—their agenda will blow your mind.
- Show me the money: naming the billionaires and fat cats really out to get Trump.
- How patriotism suddenly became “white nationalism” linking Trump to Hitler and the KKK .
- The growing secularism of the left and how the hate pushed against Christians will backfire.
- Why every effort to demonize Trump and his supporters is failing like crazy.
- Obama’s agenda: how the former president casts a much greater shadow over Trump’s political woes than you ever imagined.
- The Genius: how Trump’s brilliant strategy has worked and will continue to work, making him president again in 2021!
|Product dimensions:||9.10(w) x 6.10(h) x 1.00(d)|
About the Author
David Horowitz is a noted conservative thinker, writer and commentator and the Founder and CEO of the David Horowitz Freedom Center in Los Angeles, CA, whose mission is “to defend free societies which are under attack from enemies within and without, both secular and religious;” and further, to defend the principles of individual freedom, the rule of law, private property, limited government and to reestablish academic freedom in American schools. The Freedom Center publishes the online news magazine FrontPageMag.com, where Horowitz serves as Editor-in-Chief. David Horowitz grew up a "red diaper baby" in a communist community in Sunnyside, Queens, and was one of the founders of the New Left in the 1960s and an editor of its largest magazine, Ramparts; but forced to confront some difficult truths about the political left, Horowitz ultimately found a political and intellectual home as a conservative activist.Cultural critic Camille Paglia has said of David Horowitz: "I respect the astute and rigorously unsentimental David Horowitz as one of America's most original and courageous political analysts. . . .I think that, a century from now, cultural historians will find David Horowitz's spiritual and political odyssey paradigmatic for our time."Norman Podhoretz, former editor of Commentary magazine, says of Horowitz: "David Horowitz is hated by the Left because he is not only an apostate but has been even more relentless and aggressive in attacking his former political allies than some of us who preceded him in what I once called 'breaking ranks' with that world. He has also taken the polemical and organizational techniques he learned in his days on the left, and figured out how to use them against the Left, whose vulnerabilities he knows in his bones."Horowitz has written well over a dozen books, including The New York Times Bestseller BIG AGENDA: Trump’s Real Plan to Save America, as well as DARK AGENDA: The War to Destroy Christian America, Unholy Alliance, The Black Book of the American Left, Take No Prisoners, Progressive Racism, The ProFessors and his celebrated memoirs Mortality & Faith and Radical Son.https://www.horowitzfreedomcenter.org/ http://www.frontpagemag.com/ The David Horowitz Freedom Center is located in Los Angeles, CA.
Table of ContentsPreface xi1 The Trump Threat 12 Divide, Sabotage, Resist 133 Drain the Swamp 234 Identity Politics 375 Make America Safe 476 Impeachment by Any Means 617 America the Ugly 738 The Terror Caucus 899 Green Communism 10310 “Equality” Versus Freedom 11311 Trump Derangement 12312 Impeachment by Hearsay 14313 What the President Actually Did 16114 The MAGA President’s War 185 Afterword 203
- The Nine Biggest Dangers to America from the Anti-Trump Left
- The Top Ten Lies the Democrats Have Told You
Preface to BLITZOn December 18, 2019, the forty-fifth President of the United States, Donald J. Trump, was impeached by the Democrat-controlled House of Representatives. The impeachment took place a month shy of three years after Trump’s inauguration in 2017, and no crime was alleged to have been committed. The vote was strictly along party lines: All House Republicans along with three Democrats voted not to impeach. Only Democrats voted to pass the two exceptionally vague articles of impeachment—“abuse of power” and “obstruction of Congress.” It was the first partisan impeachment in American history.Seven weeks later, on February 5, 2020, the U.S. Senate voted to acquit the president of the impeachment charges. His exoneration was also the result of a party-line vote. Only one Republican senator with a history of personal grievance against the president joined the Democrat minority in seeking to remove him. The final vote was 51–49. To convict a sitting president, the Constitution requires a vote of sixty-seven senators. The fact that the vote fell so short of the constitutional requirement—an outcome predicted by all involved— underscored the unusual circumstances of this moment in American politics, and the unprecedented divisions that lay behind them. During three years of Democrat attempts to remove the president on ever-changing grounds, Americans had come to realize that their country was off course, loosed from its constitutional moorings and far from its traditional orders of business.How far? As head of the Judiciary Committee, Representative Jerrold Nadler was one of the two principal House managers of the impeachment process in the Senate. In the heat of those hearings, Republican senators refused to support a Democrat demand about how to run the proceedings. Nadler accused them of orchestrating a “cover-up” of the president’s alleged impeachable deeds. Nadler then went a momentous step further and called this opposition to a Democrat attempt to define the terms of the president’s trial “obviously a treacherous vote.” In other words, if Republicans didn’t agree with a Democrat effort to remove their president, that was treason.Only twenty-one years earlier, during the impeachment of Democrat Bill Clinton, the same Jerrold Nadler had warned against precisely such partisan efforts to remove a sitting president. He called them a threat to the very fabric of America’s constitutional order: “There must never be a narrowly voted impeachment or an impeachment supported by one of our major political parties and opposed by the other. Such an impeachment . . . would produce divisiveness and bitterness in our politics for years to come and will call into question the very legitimacy of our political institutions.”These were wise words. America’s constitutional order, with its separation of powers and system of checks and balances, was designed to force warring factions to compromise and come together. The founders intended by these means to ensure stability and domestic peace. The fact that a prominent legislator, not to mention an entire political party, would dismiss these safeguards and pursue the very factionalism the founders feared was a disturbing indication of the dangerous waters the nation had entered.At first glance, the candidate who emerged in 2016 should hardly have seemed a potentially divisive force. Donald Trump was a lifelong funder of liberal causes, a friend of the Clintons, a supporter of reproductive choice, an early advocate for inner-city children, a proponent of government programs and government spending. He seemed a likely figure to work with the opposing party on common interests. Yet before he ever entered the White House, the Democrats developed a hatred for Trump unprecedented in the annals of American politics. They formed a “Resistance” to his presidency, boycotted his inauguration, organized massive street demonstrations behind the slogan “Not My President,” and began talking about impeaching him before he even entered the Oval Office.In committing themselves to these uncompromising factional lines, and launching a movement to sabotage Trump’s presidency, Democrats left behind half the country that had voted for him. Instead of seeking to win over the hearts and minds of Trump’s supporters in the tradition of American politics, they attacked his voters as “racists,” “white nationalists,” “sexists,” “homophobes,” and “Islamophobes,” and then included them in a Trump “basket of deplorables.” In doing so the Democrats forged an iron bond between leader and followers. Never in American history had a president been subjected to such withering and personally vindictive attacks. When Trump’s followers saw the wounds he was willing to suffer for them, they rallied to his defense.Consequently, during the Democrats’ attempts to impeach Trump as a menace to the country—“a national security threat”—his support numbers grew and grew. The day of his acquittal, Gallup reported that Trump’s approval ratings had reached their highest point in his presidency. Republican Party approval ratings surged dramatically as well, while Republican fund-raising was at record levels. Yet Democrats persisted in their unrestrained personal attacks, apparently not grasping the fact that their unintended effect was to transform the man they called a “bully” into the perpetual victim.Traditionally Democrats have approached politics as a form of war conducted by other means, while Republicans have entered the political arena as pragmatists and accountants. But the siege of Donald Trump has begun to create a new Republican Party, passionate and combative in defense of a leader they believe has stood up for them, and—equally important—who exceeds them in his appetite for combat. “Populism” is the term political observers have drawn on to describe this phenomenon. The energy populism creates adds up to the blitz that is described in this book, and that has enabled him to overpower his opposition.BLITZ tells the story of the conflicts that define our troubling political era. It examines the sources of these political divisions, the causes of the confrontational path Democrats have chosen, and the strategic vision of a commander-in-chief willing to engage the battles and determined to win them.
- • •