×
Uh-oh, it looks like your Internet Explorer is out of date.
For a better shopping experience, please upgrade now.

45.0
In Stock
Overview
For students of the early American republic, James Madison has long been something of a riddle, the member of the founding generation whose actions and thought most stubbornly resist easy summary. The staunchest of Federalists in the 1780s, Madison would turn on his former allies shortly thereafter, renouncing their expansive nationalism as a threat to the Constitution and to popular government.
In a study that combines penetrating textual analysis with deep historical awareness, Gary Rosen stakes out important new ground by showing the philosophical consistency in Madison's long and controversial public life. The key, he argues, is Madison's profound originality as a student of the social compact, the venerable liberal idea into which he introduced several novel, and seemingly illiberal, principles.
Foremost among these was the need for founding to be the work of an elite few. For Madison, prior accounts of the social compact, in their eagerness to establish the proper ends of government, provided a hopelessly naive account of its origin. As he saw it, the Federal Convention of 1787 was an opportunity for those of outstanding prudence (understood in its fullest Aristotelian sense) to do for the people what they could not do for themselves. This troublesome reliance on the few was balanced, Rosen contends, by Madison's commitment to republicanism as an end in itself, a conclusion that he likewise drew from the social compact, accommodating the proud political claims that his philosophical predecessors had failed to recognize.
Rosen goes on to show how Madison's idiosyncratic understanding of the social compact illuminates his differences not only with Hamilton but with Jefferson as well. Both men, Madison feared, were too ready to resort to original principles in coming to terms with the Constitution, putting at risk the fragile achievement of the founding in their determination to invoke, respectively, the claims of the few and the many.
As American Compact persuasively concludes, Madison's ideas on the origin and aims of the Constitution are not just of historical interest. They carry crucial lessons for our own day, and speak directly to current disputes over diversity, constitutional interpretation, the fate of federalism, and the possibilities and limits of American citizenship.
In a study that combines penetrating textual analysis with deep historical awareness, Gary Rosen stakes out important new ground by showing the philosophical consistency in Madison's long and controversial public life. The key, he argues, is Madison's profound originality as a student of the social compact, the venerable liberal idea into which he introduced several novel, and seemingly illiberal, principles.
Foremost among these was the need for founding to be the work of an elite few. For Madison, prior accounts of the social compact, in their eagerness to establish the proper ends of government, provided a hopelessly naive account of its origin. As he saw it, the Federal Convention of 1787 was an opportunity for those of outstanding prudence (understood in its fullest Aristotelian sense) to do for the people what they could not do for themselves. This troublesome reliance on the few was balanced, Rosen contends, by Madison's commitment to republicanism as an end in itself, a conclusion that he likewise drew from the social compact, accommodating the proud political claims that his philosophical predecessors had failed to recognize.
Rosen goes on to show how Madison's idiosyncratic understanding of the social compact illuminates his differences not only with Hamilton but with Jefferson as well. Both men, Madison feared, were too ready to resort to original principles in coming to terms with the Constitution, putting at risk the fragile achievement of the founding in their determination to invoke, respectively, the claims of the few and the many.
As American Compact persuasively concludes, Madison's ideas on the origin and aims of the Constitution are not just of historical interest. They carry crucial lessons for our own day, and speak directly to current disputes over diversity, constitutional interpretation, the fate of federalism, and the possibilities and limits of American citizenship.
Product Details
ISBN-13: | 9780700609604 |
---|---|
Publisher: | University Press of Kansas |
Publication date: | 07/01/1999 |
Series: | American Political Thought Series |
Pages: | 250 |
Product dimensions: | 5.90(w) x 8.90(h) x 0.90(d) |
Table of Contents
AcknowledgmentsIntroduction: Many Madisons
1. The Social Compact Reconsidered
2. Pride, Property, and American Nationhood
3. The Paradox of Liberal Prudence
4. The Federal Convention as Founder
5. Confronting Jefferson and Hamilton
6. The Legitimate Meaning of the Constitution
Conclusion: The Madisonian Regime Today
Notes
Bibliography
Index
Customer Reviews
Related Searches
Explore More Items
When political debates devolve, as they often do these days, into a contest between big-government ...
When political debates devolve, as they often do these days, into a contest between big-government
progressivism and natural rights individualism, Americans tend to appeal to the “self-evident” truths inscribed in the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution. But Peter Lawler ...
Young James Madison learned to read at the age of five and books became his ...
Young James Madison learned to read at the age of five and books became his
world for the next five years. In March 1761 he reached his tenth birthday and his learning moved in a diffrent direction. His father posed ...
A lot of ink has been spilled covering the lives of history's most influential figures, ...
A lot of ink has been spilled covering the lives of history's most influential figures,
but how much of the forest is lost for the trees? In Charles River Editors' American Legends series, readers can get caught up to speed ...
It's not just the bully in the schoolyard that we should be worried about. The ...
It's not just the bully in the schoolyard that we should be worried about. The
one-on-one bullying that dominates the national conversation, this timely book suggests, is actually part of a larger problem—a natural outcome of the bullying nature of ...
James Stoner's purpose is an ambitious one: to recover the common law basis of American ...
James Stoner's purpose is an ambitious one: to recover the common law basis of American
constitutionalism.American constitutionalism in general, he argues, and judicial review in particular, cannot be fully understood without acknowledging their roots in both common law and liberal ...
It is an institution that seems almost hopelessly out of date, a social relic of ...
It is an institution that seems almost hopelessly out of date, a social relic of
bygone times. The very word debutante evokes images of prim, poised beauty, expensive gowns, and sumptuous balls, all of which seem anachronistic in these post-women's ...
The congregants thanked God that they weren’t like all those hopeless people outside the church, ...
The congregants thanked God that they weren’t like all those hopeless people outside the church,
bound for hell. So the Westboro Baptist Church’s Sunday service began, and Rebecca Barrett-Fox, a curious observer, wondered why anyone would seek spiritual sustenance through ...
Of the hundreds of thousands of soldiers who died in the Civil War, two-thirds, by ...
Of the hundreds of thousands of soldiers who died in the Civil War, two-thirds, by
some estimates, were felled by disease; untold others were lost to accidents, murder, suicide, sunstroke, and drowning. Meanwhile thousands of civilians in both the north ...