by Robert J. Sawyer

NOOK Book(eBook)

$7.99 View All Available Formats & Editions

Available on Compatible NOOK Devices and the free NOOK Apps.
WANT A NOOK?  Explore Now

Customer Reviews

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

See All Customer Reviews

FlashForward 3.7 out of 5 based on 0 ratings. 129 reviews.
readtolive_livetoread More than 1 year ago
In the very near future of 2009, two physicists working on a complicated experiment accidentally thrust the collective consciousness of the entire world ahead twenty-one years. Although the "flash forward," as it's later named, lasts only minutes, the aftermath is catastrophic. Not only are millions of people killed in accidents caused by their sudden and brief departure from the present (i.e. plane and car crashes, falls down stairs, etc.), but those who survived find themselves emotionally rocked by their respective (and sometimes shared) glimpses of the future. The two scientists are left to piece together what happened, while also trying to figure out whether or not the future they all saw was fixed or just one of many possible outcomes. This sci-fi/thriller/murder mystery plays out like an extended episode of The Outer Limits. Imagine if a super-conductor being operated at the CERN laboratory in Geneva actually causes the entire human race to experience two minuttes of their consciousness being transported 21 years into the future. A neat idea that, in lesser hands, would have been given pulp treatment. Sawyer deftly shows not only the brilliance of these visions but also the tragic results of all human activity coming to a halt for 2 minutes (countless tradgedies and disasters worldwide). Also, not all governments and individuals are thrilled about the glimpse into the future and what it reveals to them. Throw into the mix the fact that one of the CERN Physicists has no vision because he must not exist 21 years in the future - a fact proven by the hundreds of individuals who have visions that include the revalation that he was murdered a few days prior to the "flash forward". Fantastic read.
alexia561 More than 1 year ago
I picked up this book because I like the TV show so much that I wanted to learn more. There are major differences between the two, mainly that the flashforward in the book is 20 years in the future, while the flashforward in the TV show is only 6 months. I think 6 months makes the story more compelling, and has a more immediate effect on the characters and the choices they start making. While the book centered on scientists and explained the scientific cause of the flashforward, I prefer the FBI agents on the show not knowing the cause. I have to admit that all of the scientific explanations bogged the story down and I skimmed over those pages. Gave this a 3 out of 5 rating as it's a great premise and I enjoyed it, but it was a little on the dry side and I could have done without all of the science. Not a must read, but just okay.
Maria_of_amor More than 1 year ago
That's I felt like I was reading at certain parts of this book. But putting that aside, it did make for a very interesting novel. I was a little annoyed when this (French Canadian) writer took pot shots at Americans; making us look like the root of all evil or a bunch of bafoons, but still, I managed to get over that also. Like any other "time travel" book, this novel seemed to say that what happened during the "flash forward" was all do to the knowledge everyone had that resulted from the flashforward which people remembered in the future when it actually took place 21 years earlier .....confused yet? You won't be once you read this book. A fine piece of writing setting aside all the quirks I mentioned previously in this review. The ending was kind of disappointing but still an enjoyable book for any Sci-fi fan.
Guest More than 1 year ago
The interpretations of the applications of quantum physics in the story line is the greatest draw. A basic background in quantum oddities may help. Even without that, the premise of seeing a piece of one's future makes for a thought provoking read.
Etruit More than 1 year ago
This is a book written for physicists, which isn't a bad thing, but there's almost nothing to the story itself that keeps you engaged. The cause of the flashforward isn't very compelling, and the aftermath of the LHC characters is tired and weak. The only part I really enjoyed were the "glimpses" of the future for a book written in 1999, taking place in 2009, and trying to predict a future in 2031.
harstan More than 1 year ago
In 2009 some of the world's leading research physicists gather at the CERN research facility to conduct an experiment using the Hardon Collider to "capture" the Higgs Boson subatomic particle. The lead scientists Lloyd Simcoe and Theo Procopides anticipate success and a subsequent Nobel Prize. However something occurs around the globe at the moment the atom smashing experiment begins. Every human on earth who survives sees a two minute visionary clip of themselves in 2030. However, millions died when the collective sub-consciousness led to all types of accidents and disasters during the 120 seconds. Simcoe is stunned more so with what he saw rather than the deadly fiasco the experiment caused. He is engaged to marry one woman, but saw his wife of the future was another female. Theo had no vision so he assumes he will be dead before 2030; he believes he will be a murder victim. They try to replicate their experiment, but fail until they realize timing is everything as they go for a third try when a neutrino shower occurs as both want more information about the future regardless of cost. This is an engaging cautionary science fiction thriller that uses the Frankenstein concept of scientists having no ethical boundaries experimenting, even encouraged by the second and third times they replicated the experiment. The story line is fast-paced and exciting, but chooses the thriller aspects over the emotional elements beyond a personal need to know. The two scientists know their experiment killed more people in two minutes than some of the monsters of history did during brutal reigns yet they don't seem to care on a personal level. Still this is an exhilarating thriller as the world sees a flash forward moment and each reacts accordingly to what they prefer to see. Harriet Klausner
ElroyJetson More than 1 year ago
If you love a good time travel story, this book should be at the top of your list. If murder-mystery is more you thing, this book has that too. Robert Sawyer, so as not to leave any one out, has written a great hard science story too. The way Sawyer approaches time travel in this story is certainly unique and really makes you think about life. What would you do with a glimpse at your future? What would you do if your dreams were not realized? Give up? Sawyer also explores the idea of time being fixed, what is going to happen is immutable, and the idea that time is changeable, that we have an infinite number of futures dependent on the choices we make now for tomorrows outcomes. He masterfully explores both of this theories without ever clearly forcing either upon you, even by the end of the story you are still left to choose which theory you agree with most. This story is well researched and based in current science theory. I highly recommend this book.
Scott_Clements on LibraryThing More than 1 year ago
Another great book that left me pondering my own life. What would I do if I had a 2 minute glimpse into my own future? It's fun to see Sawyer's view of what the entire world did with that 2 minute glimpse.They made the TV show out of this, which is why I read it, and the book was far better (and I loved the TV show)Well done Robert J. Sawyer!
auntmarge64 on LibraryThing More than 1 year ago
A quick SF read about the consequences of a mass suspension of consciousness throughout the world, during which every person viewed their future (or lack of it), 21 years in the future. It's a bit uneven, sometimes propelled along by action, then slowing considerably as various theories of physics are explained. But it held together and had a satisfying resolution.
gypsysmom on LibraryThing More than 1 year ago
In 2009 Lloyd Simcoe and Theo Procopides were physicists at CERN, the particle collider institute in Switzerland, and they were hoping to create conditions to finally see the Higgs boson. Instead, when they started their instrument everyone in the world blacked out for two minutes. Most people had a vision of themselves in the future. But the tragedy was that all those people who were driving or doing other things that required attention were no longer in control and many people died. Lloyd's fiancee's daughter was hit by an out of control car and died. Theo did not have a vision which meant that he was not alive at that point in the future even though he is quite a bit younger than Lloyd. Lloyd has his own dilemma in that his vision showed him in bed with a woman who is not his fiancee. It wasn't clear whether the experiment caused the world-wide black out but Lloyd is convinced it did. While he tries to work out what went wrong (because they didn't see any Higgs boson) Theo tries to find out his cause of death. He soon learns that he was murdered a few days before the date of the vision and he is determined to find out who killed him.These story lines and others are gripping and I had trouble turning off my PDA in order to sleep or work. What would happen if people had a glimpse of their future? Is the future immutable? Will Lloyd and his fiancee marry and stay together despite his vision? Will Theo be murdered?Yet another winner from Sawyer.
Chintas on LibraryThing More than 1 year ago
I enjoyed this but felt that the setup and development was let down by the ending. Not bad, but had more promise that pay-off.
MonkeyDoctor on LibraryThing More than 1 year ago
I am surprised something this substandard could win a Hugo. Whilst an interesting premise - that a physics experiment at CERN accidentally gives everyone a 2 minute vision of their own future 20 years ahead, the writing lets it down.Shallow characterisation makes it difficult to empathise, and plot turns all seem to be remarkably convenient. The fact that millions died in the event seems to spark very little world anger against CERN when they accept responsibility.The author bemoans at one point the wider worlds lack of understanding of - and enthusiasm for - science, yet seems to think and write exactly like a young scientist who has no concept of normal human interaction. And thus writes an unfortunately dull book.
ct.bergeron on LibraryThing More than 1 year ago
I reserved this book at my library, only after I found out that the TV serie with the same name was based on this book. Now After reading the book I can safely say it was loosely based on it. The story was very fun to read, I am not a huge fan of science fiction, but the story was not incredibly fictionnal. It shown a possible future, a possible experiment, a possible ending. Truly interesting, not to heavy, especially when the author was explaining all the physic required. I would recommand it to everyone.
scistarz on LibraryThing More than 1 year ago
The best part of the book was the unique way of how the author presented the scifi ish aspect. Could it be possible?...
crazybatcow on LibraryThing More than 1 year ago
The good points:1) the "science" in the story is well conceived (and is similar in concept to that in Hominids) and is believable within the context of the story2) there are fewer stereotypes than in Hominids and the politicking sometimes fits in with the storyThe bad point that sums up this novel: it's stupidThe premise could have led to a very interesting story - humankind could have tried to deal with what they knew about the future, or tried to replicate the flash forward, or investigate why or how it happened, etc. But what happens instead? It turns into a soap opera about a handful of characters who, regardless of their age or gender, behave how one would expect 30-35 year old males to act. The science fiction stops and the male version of a chick flick starts.If you knew you were going to be murdered in 21 years time would you spend all your time and energy obsessing to figure out who did it NOW, considering that some of the significant players are still children? Would you fly across the world NOW to meet a woman you know you'll have sex with in 21 years time? Do you think there's even a slight chance that the powers that be would NOT re-use a "time machine"? If you say yes to any of these, then you might like this story.Otherwise... save your money...
nothingtosay on LibraryThing More than 1 year ago
A Sci-Fi thriller took place at CERN in Geneva and various part of the country.
bcquinnsmom on LibraryThing More than 1 year ago
Set in 2009, Sawyer takes as his premise that in the midst of ordinary life one day everyone on the planet loses consciousness for a few minutes and wakes up knowing his or her future in the year 2030. For some it is a good thing, but not for all. As scientists puzzle over what caused the flashforward (as the phenomenon came to be known), others are trying their best to deal with their futures that haven't yet occurred. Sawyer offers his readers the opportunity to enter the debate over destiny vs. free will, having his characters enter into philosophical discourse as well as lectures on certain concepts of quantum physics, the nature of God, and reality. There are really only two negatives about my experience with this book. First, the characters are a bit cardboardish and ultimately forgettable. I liked them as scientists but when they were in their own personal lives they were a bit flat. Second, the ending of the book (which I won't give away) didn't seem to fit for some reason. Overall, the story itself was a good one, although at times it became a bit dense while trying to slog through the science. I think that people who enjoy more technical (hard) science fiction will really like this one. If you're not up on the discussion of Schrodinger's Cat, you may want to spend some time reading about it before you start this book. I spent a long time trying to figure it out, since I was not blessed with a brain that does science. Others who may be interested in the philosophy behind the story (free will vs. an immutable destiny) will also enjoy it. I can definitely recommend it.
klh on LibraryThing More than 1 year ago
Similar to the writing style of Kim Stanley Robinson. Reads somewhat like a novelized TV movie. Far more about interpersonal relations than science, free will vs. destiny. Even goes so far as to mention directly the (actual) works of a physicist who has written works linking quantum theory and Christianity. Final section wraps everything up with excessive neatness. There was some fun in reading it a week or two AFTER when the bulk of the action is set (April, 2009), especially with the LHC offline instead of causing problems as depicted in the story.
tlryan1 on LibraryThing More than 1 year ago
The ending reduced this book by one star. The entire books seems to be a set up for the author to discuss his "philosophy". Also too numerous to count the number of time "doubtless" was used - a good editor would have helped.
Abbyroad909 on LibraryThing More than 1 year ago
A good book that could have been great. What if we were all granted a peek at our lives 20 years from now? How would we react, and how would it impact society, technology, and individual lives? It's a great question, and while some of the answers are interesting, the book has a couple of problems. The characters don't really grab you, but rather seem flat, characterized really only by their futures (one good, one bad, one basically indifferent). Sawyer also takes some serious leaps (at one point it is "surprisingly easy" to get the world to agree to another flash forward. Yes, that would be surprising. It felt a little lazy to let it go that easily) and often people don't behave like it seems they should. In spite of that, the begininng and even middle of the book are great. The ending was unsatisfying, but overall the book is worth reading.
Raven on LibraryThing More than 1 year ago
In April 2009, two scientists spearheading an experiment in particle physics at CERN switch on the Large Hadron Collider. Entirely unexpectedly, something happens: the consciousness of every person on Earth slips forward approximately twenty years into the future. Two minutes later, they return to themselves - but the world has been irrevocably changed by foreknowledge. Isn't that a great idea for a novel? I thought so. It's shame the execution is so terrible. Detailing all that is wrong with it will take time, but I'll make that sacrifice. First of all, the prose is, well, it has a utilitarian cast at best. At worst, it can descend into he said and then she said and then they went out but they opened the door first. He's particularly fond of emphasising how much research he's done. Two-page digressions on quantum physics are not uncommon. And then, there are the characters - all of which are puppet-like, wheeled on and off stage as the author likes without a spark of life to them; particularly awful are his women, who exist to cry after men or get naked for men. There's one incident where a male character Has! A! Realisation! that for a woman, going out on a dark street at night with a man she's only just met is a bad idea. For some reason, Sawyer tells us this as though it's a great and profound insight. (And I'm sure someone will want to tell me that women aren't really the target audience for the novel, blah blah blah shut up. A novel about the future that doesn't have anything to say about women is, shall we say, fundamentally lacking.)In the end, though, I give this three stars. Because the idea, which could have been done so well, is a really great idea, and perhaps some day someone will steal it and extract the great, literary novel out of it that Sawyer could have.
BookyVT on LibraryThing More than 1 year ago
I like the way Sawyer incorporates some the unintended consequences of our technology in his stories.
irunsjh on LibraryThing More than 1 year ago
A good book. The beginning was a very quick read. I like the mosaic aspect of the book and would have been very happy to see the book continue on in that direction. I thought the end was a little bit of a cheat, but still interesting enough. I am interested to see how the TV show carries this book off. From what I have seen, it appears as if it is just the premise only.
BryanThomasS on LibraryThing More than 1 year ago
Interesting book. Completely different than the TV show, which is disappointing, because I thought the book was dynamic and a good read and could have added much to the series, but with the series they went more for mysterious suspense.
usnmm2 on LibraryThing More than 1 year ago
If you know what your future was in 22 years , could you change it? Could you use it? That's the basic theme of this book. The book starts out fast an furious and goes down hill from there. The characters are predictable and the plot forced to a point where I couldn't suspend my disbelief and go along with the story.The highlight of the book is when half the world starts to complains about a "flashforward" gapI'm always on the lookout for new (to me ) sci fi writers. so on the plus side I'm going to try some of Sawyer's other books. He has won a Hugo and Nebula awards along with John W Campbell Memorial Award.